|
|
|
Terminology
Some important terms to grasp to fully understand the manual.
- roxen module
A component of a virtual server that fills some specific purpose, such
as RXML parsing, providing a filesystem or similar. A roxen module is
a piece of code interfacing to the roxen module API, extending the
server's features. Roxen modules may be implemented in pike or Java.
- pike module
A pike module is, unlike roxen modules, not something seen by the
common roxen user or administrator. A pike module extends the pike
language environment, providing the programmer alone with some
features, abstraction or similar, such as the SQL and Image modules.
- virtual filesystem
The virtual filesystem is the entire path namespace of your server,
as seen in the URL's path segment. In a basic roxen setup with just a
common filesystem module mounted at / (the filesystem root),
all files in the virtual filesystem map to this one filesystem, as is
typically the case with other webservers where you have a single
document root.
Roxen, however, has a slightly different approach to filesystems,
that shares many characteristics with Unix filesystems. Several
filesystems may be mounted on top of each other at different, or indeed
the same, mountpoints in the virtual namespace of the server. If one
filesystem is mounted at /, another at /I/live/ and
a third at /I/live/here/, a request for the file
/I/live/here/happily.html may deliver a file residing in
either filesystem. Which one is decided first by the longest matching
mountpoint, secondly the filesystem modules' priorities (as set by the
administrator) and finally by which filesystem actually has a file to
deliver.
Similarly, even entire other virtual
servers may be mounted somewhere within your server's namespace,
effectively blacking it out to your server. This also means that such
a server's virtual filesystem does not map one-to-one to the path
namespace as seen in the URL from the browser's point of view. What to
the browser looks like a request of the file
/my/secret/garden.jpg could quite possibly be the file
/secret/garden.jpg from a virtual server mounted
at /my/.
Due to the dynamic nature of roxen, a file in the virtual
filesystem need not exist as an actual file on disk (as it would in a
real filesystem), but might be the result of some
on-the-fly file-generation activity in a roxen module of some sort.
Indeed, even the error page received when roxen didn't find a file,
exists in the virtual filesystem (wherever anything else doesn't).
To find out what actually happens when requesting a given URL from
your server; where the file has its origin, what modules touch it and
so on, the "Resolve path..." option in the Maintenance menu under the
Tasks tab in the administration interface does wonders.
- real filesystem
The real filesystem refers, unlike the virtual filesystem
discussed above, to the filesystems provided by the operating system,
where actual files reside; typically on a hard disk, network
filesystem or similar. As the name hints, files on disk might be
considered just the slightest bit more real than the figments of
imagination that may be harvested from the virtual filesystem.
- mountpoint
The term refers to where location modules are found in the
virtual filesystem. A virtual file's path is considered to
be below a certain mountpoint when the path begins with the the entire
length of the mountpoint; for instance, /demo/4 is below both
mountpoints / and /demo/ but not below
/demo/module/ or /hello/world/. A mount point need
not necessarily end in a slash, but it is a rather common convention.
- virtual server
Back in the old days, a web server was one website serving files
through one port at one host. Things change, and the world grows more
complex. The widespread trend of abstracting a concept and tagging it
"virtual" applies to virtual servers, as much as it does to the
virtual filesystem; a virtual server in roxen is a
collection of roxen modules working together under a common roof.
The criterion of being accessable on a single host:port combination
does not apply in roxen, nor the fact that the server uses the entire
namespace of that domain. By using several server URL:s for a virtual
server, it can respond to requests for several domains, on several
ports possibly using several different protocols (eg HTTP, HTTPS and
FTP, all to the same virtual filesystem). Or, just as
possible, if given the sole server URL
http://my.domain/just/here/, it will not see requests for any
other part of the namespace of some other server handling
http://my.domain/ than those below /just/here/.
Equally possible, although not the most common of configurations, is
not to mount any port at all.
|
|